Talk:Rome/Vaticano

Necessary?

Is this district really necessary? Can't we just use Vatican City to cover the area? (WT-en) Jpatokal 12:39, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Technically and functionally, they're different things. For example, there's no public accommodations in Vatican City, but there are plenty in the Vaticano district... same for bars, restaurants, etc... (WT-en) Maj 18:35, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Edits like this are why I think it would make a lot of sense to merge these... (WT-en) Jpatokal 11:25, 13 June 2007 (EDT)

Angel Hotel

The discussion of the Angel Hotel was not only copied from the hotel's own web site, but it's not very clear. It says "Sited in an ancient building of the ‘900 ..." That's what the hotel's web site says, but I don't know what the "'900" is. I thought it might be a translation of "Novecento", which is Italian for either "900" or "20th century". But if the building was built in the 20th century, that wouldn't be ancient.