Wikivoyage

Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/August 2010

< Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion

Archive for Project:Votes for deletion acted on in August 2010. If you can't find the chronicle that interests you here, try Project:Votes for deletion/July 2010 or Project:Votes for deletion/September 2010 for things that may have happened earlier or later, respectively.

  • Delete. This is either an advertisement or a first-person account, neither of which meet the Project:What is an article criteria. I didn't speedy-delete it only because if it's a first person account then hopefully the contributor will see this and contribute to Siem Reap instead (but please read our Tour policy first). -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 02:47, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete! My guess is it is an ad. IP address it was posted from is in Cambodia, which is odd for a traveller reporting now on a 2007 trip. (WT-en) Pashley 04:45, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Also, it appears to be a copyvio. Identical text at . (WT-en) Pashley 04:51, 1 August 2010 (EDT)
    • Based on Pashley's info and the fact that this user hasn't returned I'd be fine with a speedy delete, unless anyone objects. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 09:17, 2 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Speedy Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 09:55, 2 August 2010 (EDT)

Non-commercial license on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/feffef/448513287/ -- (WT-en) LtPowers 15:03, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused, poor quality image of an unknown beach. If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a person with no model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Larger version of the above image. Unused image, recognizable person with no model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused, poor quality image of the back-end of a Quantas jet. If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into, although I'd argue strongly that it's not of high enough quality to use in any of our guides. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of benches in the Sydney airport terminal. This is unused, and it's non-descript enough that adding it to the Sydney article wouldn't improve the article in any possible way. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused and very blurry image of a rock on Tioman island. The image is of too poor quality to make it worthwhile to add it to that article. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Blurry, unused thumbnail of a cafe(?). No indication of what article this could be added to, but the small size and poor quality make this a candidate for deletion rather than anything to add to an article. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail of a picket fence from the same user as Image:086.jpg. If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into, although the small image size and lack of license info suggests this might be a copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail of a street somewhere from the same user as Image:086.jpg. If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into, although the small image size and lack of license info suggests this might be a copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail of a harbor somewhere from the same user as Image:086.jpg. If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into, although the small image size and lack of license info suggests this might be a copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image, of what I'm not entirely sure - scarves? If anyone feels that this should be kept please indicate what article to incorporate it into. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:38, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image, apparently of someone named "Melvin". No model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:42, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of an anime(?) princess. No model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused cartoon image of a kid doing a handstand. No model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused, blurry image of something at night, but what exactly I can't tell. Image is of such poor quality as to be of no use for our guides. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused cartoon image of an elephant, which violates our "no cartoon images of elephants" guideline. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a guy sitting at a computer. No travel value, and no model release. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a guy holding a soda. No model release, and unless someone wants to start a "How to hold a soda while traveling" article then this also has no value for travel. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:57, 30 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:56, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This broken redirect page points to a non-existant page. The only difference in name is capitalization. There are no links to this redirect page. (WT-en) Bill in STL 18:38, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Keep. While we (surprisingly) don't yet seem to have an article for Voyageurs National Park, that is a valid destination so a redirect would be the preferred solution. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:46, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Withdrawn. Page added for the park so this redirect now points to a real page. (WT-en) Bill in STL 23:51, 2 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Redirected. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:32, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete - The useful information has been merged to the Agra article. This article title doesn't meet the guidelines so a redirect is not useful. --(WT-en) Sebindi 10:47, 6 August 2010 (EDT)

Speedy deleted. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 16:26, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Speedy Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:32, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused template that duplicates the functionality of Template:Geo. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:23, 3 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Not sure. The functionality is not duplicate at all; Template:Geo displays nothing on the screen and only creates RDF code. Template:Coordinates displays a box within the article that shows the coords and a link to Google Earth. Now, granted, we have no provision in our guidelines for such a feature, but someone at some point thought it might be a good idea. I think I might prefer we discuss whether or not we should make coordinate display more prominent; if we do, this template might be useful. (If we don't, then I would suggest redirecting this to Template:Geo as a useful alias, rather than deleting it.) (WT-en) LtPowers 08:04, 4 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Redirect - I don't think anybody (maybe except a few experts) have any use directly viewing the coordinates in an article. It will only clutter the guide. The information is great to use for other (yet to be developed?) features but the display of the numbers seems useless. Therefore redirect to the RDF-Template Template:Geo and lose this info box. --(WT-en) Sebindi 11:14, 6 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Redirected. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:37, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a hotel pool. Advertisement for a business and thus not an image we're likely to ever use. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image meant to promote a specific Days' Inn hotel. Advertising images are called out as something Wikivoyage specifically does not use. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image meant to promote a specific Days' Inn hotel. Advertising images are called out as something Wikivoyage specifically does not use. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image meant to promote a specific Days' Inn hotel. Advertising images are called out as something Wikivoyage specifically does not use. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a plate of food. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Thumbnail image with a border around it, currently used in the Nakhon Ratchasima article. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Grainy image of a bus, currently used in the Nakhon Ratchasima article. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Thumbnail image with a border around it, currently used in the Nakhon Ratchasima article. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Image of a temple in Thailand, currently used in the Phimai article. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:04, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:04, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:04, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image. See Special:Contributions/(WT-en) LQuach. This user uploaded a variety of images without license specified, some of which are tiny thumbnails, some of which have borders, and all of which seem to have been taken with different cameras. This screams "copyvio", so it's best to get rid of the lot of them. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:04, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image, recognizable person with no model release, and it appears that it was meant to advertise swimming with dolphins at a specific resort. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:08, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image with a copyright notice on its bottom right, with no indication that the image has been CC-SA licensed. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:42, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image with a copyright notice on its bottom right, with no indication that the image has been CC-SA licensed. Smaller version of Image:4098b.jpg. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:42, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image with a caption in the bottom left - since there is no license specified this is suspicious. If anyone wants to keep this image please indicate what article to include it in. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:42, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused thumbnail image with a border. The borders, size, and lack of license makes this suspicious as a potential copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:42, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused advertisement for an Arabic language school. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:51, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a person, no model release provided, no value for use in a travel guide. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:51, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a person, no model release provided, no value for use in a travel guide. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:51, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a person, no model release provided, no value for use in a travel guide. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:51, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image that looks like it was pulled off of a Bali tourism web site. The caption, lack of model release, and subject are all arguments for deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:53, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. After two edits in three minutes, the creator of this page removed all content, leaving an empty page and no links. (WT-en) Bill in STL 18:14, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:46, 2 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:01, 16 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This page duplicates information on the page St. Julian's (period after St). Already merged information from this page to the new one. Pages with links to here already updated to point to St. Julian's. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Redirect to St. Julian's. When there are multiple spellings for a destination a redirect is preferred to a deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:46, 2 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Redirected. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 15:01, 16 August 2010 (EDT)

Let me see what I can salvage from it to relevant sites first. --(WT-en) Peter (Southwood) Talk 08:42, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
Has this article been lockes somehow? I am unable to edit it. -- (WT-en) Peter (Southwood) Talk 09:07, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
No, there's nothing in the protection log. Do you get an error message of some sort? (WT-en) LtPowers 11:10, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Weak keep. If the user who created this guide was not plastering his/her company URL all across our site I think this would be a clear keep - much of the information is pretty good - but the article should not be used as a promotional tool for any particular company. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:39, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Merge into Ko Lanta, Ko Phi Phi, Ko Ngai, etc. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 05:01, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Useful content has been merged into Diving in Thailand The article may be deleted as it is now empty. -- (WT-en) Peter (Southwood) Talk 06:08, 21 June 2010 (EDT)
    • If it's been merged, the redirect needs to remain for attribution purposes. (WT-en) LtPowers 08:17, 21 June 2010 (EDT)

Outcome: redirected (WT-en) Pashley 00:11, 18 August 2010 (EDT)

nominations for Turkish Airlines and LAN Airlines moved to separate nomination, per policy ((WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. Stub that hasn't gotten a significant edit in over a year. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:54, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:15, 19 August 2010 (EDT)

separated from the Egypt Air nomination, per policy ((WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:15, 19 August 2010 (EDT)

separated from the Egypt Air nomination, per policy ((WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:15, 19 August 2010 (EDT)

I have nothing against hiking, but these two articles are almost completely empty. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 17:40, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. If someone has something to say, they can create and article and say it, or possibly add it to the main article. Creating stubs for everywhere you can hike prior to information being available there doesn't add any value. This article was created by anon 18 months ago. This was their only edit, and they haven't added any content. --(WT-en) inas 18:59, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete both since neither have received a substantial edit in over a year, and per policy stub itineraries get deleted after a year if they receive no further edits. As an aside, it is helpful to have one nomination per article (unless they are copies of one another) as it is awkward to potentially have to argue to keep one and delete another. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:42, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:27, 19 August 2010 (EDT)

A ghost town, population 544. The only thing to see is a handful of abandoned buildings. No place to stay. It hasn't appeared on official Texas highway maps since 1992, and even Google Maps can't find it properly.

  • Any further guidance on which of the two towns to redirect to? Barring further clarification, and based on a five minute search for this place using the Google, I'd lean towards a delete since I'm not sure that a redirect that may or may not be correct would actually be a good thing. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:21, 16 June 2010 (EDT)
Is that correct though? The first suggested redirect target, The Colony, is currently listed as being in Prairies and Lakes, not Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. My concern is that normally we create a redirect as an aid to the traveler, but in this case I'm not sure if 1) we're redirecting to the right place and 2) this redirect would be of any value at all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:14, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
Well, look for yourself. It is not true that Google Maps cannot find it properly, it is here with Frisco to the East and The Colony to the South. And seems to be in the Megaplex when looking there. --(WT-en) globe-trotter 09:07, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, but when I search via Google maps I get a location that's midway between Houston and San Antonio: . In either case, if a redirect to Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex makes the most sense then I don't object. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 14:53, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
Redirect The Hackberry that Google Earth directed me to is adjacent to Frisco. Hackberry the ghost town is located in Lavaca County, which is between Houston & San Antonio. Since the former seems to just be a few housing developments in a suburb, I'd say the ghost town is more interesting and this should be a redirect to the sub-region Post Oak Savannah. (WT-en) AHeneen 02:31, 20 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Redirected to Post Oak Savannah. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:37, 21 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a plate of eggs. Even if it wasn't unused, the filename on this image suggests that it might just be a test image. Also, this is a duplicate of Image:C-\štruklji.jpg. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 02:48, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unused image of a plate of eggs. Even if it wasn't unused, the filename on this image suggests that it might just be a test image. Also, this is a duplicate of Image:C-\struklji.jpg. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 02:51, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Per the article talk page this was nominated for VFD back in 2004 and kept because, per Evan, "It's a side-effect of making queries, and mostly harmless". With the current version of the software I don't think that's true any longer, so this page should be able to go away. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:12, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. List is from 2004, not current. Current list is accessible on Special Pages list. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This article exists for the same reasons as Project:!Most wanted articles, but it is no longer needed and can be deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. List is from 2004, not current. Current list is accessible on Special Pages list. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This article exists for the same reasons as Project:!Most wanted articles, but it is no longer needed and can be deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. List is from 2004, not current. Current list is accessible on Special Pages list. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This article exists for the same reasons as Project:!Most wanted articles, but it is no longer needed and can be deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. List is from 2004, not current. Current list is accessible on Special Pages list. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This article exists for the same reasons as Project:!Most wanted articles, but it is no longer needed and can be deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. List is from 2004, not current. Current list is accessible on Special Pages list. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This article exists for the same reasons as Project:!Most wanted articles, but it is no longer needed and can be deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:28, 8 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. This list does not appear to be accessible through the Special Pages list, but a list of popular articles from six years ago seems not helpful now. (WT-en) Bill in STL 19:10, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:59, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. This article was created to promote a specific travel agency, which goes against our Tour and Project:Don't tout policies. Ideally this should be redirected, but I didn't see an obvious place to redirect to so a speedy delete probably makes the most sense. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 01:51, 20 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Speedy Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 02:21, 22 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Unless I'm mistaken this IRC channel is completely unused, so the page referencing it is misleading. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:47, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
    • Keep. I'd rather not leave redlinks in old discussions that pointed to this. We can mark it as inactive. (WT-en) LtPowers 18:52, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
      • I'm OK with keeping it if needed, but there are only five links to that page, not counting the VFD, which could be cleaned up fairly easily. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:37, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
        • Well, it's also nice to have it around in case anyone wants to start it up again. (WT-en) LtPowers 20:52, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Kept. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:39, 23 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Obsolete page - phased out many years ago by newer Mediawiki versions. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:26, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. Obsolete page - phased out many years ago by newer Mediawiki versions. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:26, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This category is out of policy. The existence of the category page invites misuse. Removing the category page at least leaves the categories as red-links when used. (WT-en) Bill in STL 13:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 26 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This category is out of policy. The existence of the category page invites misuse. Removing the category page at least leaves the categories as red-links when used. (WT-en) Bill in STL 13:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 26 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. This category is out of policy. The existence of the category page invites misuse. Removing the category page at least leaves the categories as red-links when used. (WT-en) Bill in STL 13:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 26 August 2010 (EDT)

  • Delete. I'd be happy to see those offending agencies not listed anywhere on Wikivoyage. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 21:55, 14 August 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete [&Redirect]. As an original creator of that page, I'm fine with deleting; ideally with redirect to the above link, but the latter is not critical for me. --(WT-en) DenisYurkin 16:42, 17 August 2010 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:54, 27 August 2010 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage:Votes_for_deletion/August_2010&oldid=1878579"