Talk:Southern Upland Way
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Grahamsands in topic vfd 2
No significant improvements in content since import. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Existing, established, signposted routes should likely be exempt from the one-year rule. Texugo (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know about that, but the last significant edit was in August, so we're only at the 8-month mark anyway. Powers (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - It is an established waymarked route, with an official guidebook. AlasdairW (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Result: Kept. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
vfd 2 edit
Southern Upland Way edit
Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems barely usable to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, definitely. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. As a waymarked government-backed route, I think this route is exempt from the one year rule. The article is also close to being usable. AlasdairW (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Outcome: Kept. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Upgrade 
Done and the underlying city pages are all high-grade usable. Grahamsands (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)