Talk:Chiapas
| This article contains content imported from the English Wikipedia article on Chiapas. View the page revision history for a list of the authors. |
Is Catazajá not touristically important?
editI was about to add the city Catazajá in wikivoyage but it was removed because it's not touristically important or large enough.
Two weeks ago, we was heading to Campeche from Palenque and we was planing to travel by ADO bus. Unfortunately the ADO bus station was occupied we had to change our plan. The only affordable way which we found was to first go to Catazajá and then take the buss from there.
I had problem finding information about travelling via Catazajá and thought it would be a good idea to write some about it. I think Catazajá is touristically important since its close to Palenque and since it's not that uncommon in Mexico with different occupation and road blocks done by the teachers or other groups in the society.
Leonides (talk) 03:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- I can't find any record of such a page being deleted. And it is a very odd reason to delete it. When did you create it? --Inas (talk) 03:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- I only created the link to the page, and the link was removed before I had the change to edit it. Any way, Since I'm new here I'm a bit uncertain how to act now. You can find the log page at http://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Chiapas&action=history Leonides (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've created the page for you at Catazajá. Please add all the content you wish to the article. Our general criteria for article creation is that there is accommodation to sleep there, and that you wouldn't normally only visit there from somewhere else. In any event, your content will have a good home! --Inas (talk) 04:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will add the information which would be valuable for me, most visitors would just pass this village but it is possible to stay there. Unfortunately I don't know the name of the hotel in the village. Leonides (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- That's okay. It's a wiki :-) Hopefully someone will come along one day using your information, to add theirs. --Inas (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)