Softstarrs23

Thank you for contributing to Wikivoyage! Unfortunately, your contributions are extremely similar to those of a persistent vandal on Wikivoyage who likes to create empty articles about very small places, and as a result they have been reverted as a precaution - see this thread for details. If you feel that your edits have been incorrectly identified and would like to contribute to Wikivoyage constructively, there are some suggestions that you might find useful at Wikivoyage:Quick contribution guide, and you can also review Wikivoyage:What is an article? for details on what subjects get their own articles. If you have questions you can ask them on this talk page or in the pub. -- Ryan • (talk) • 21:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ryan could you please tell me why you deleted my entries? --Softstarrs23 (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Clearing my name

Swept in from the pub

Look at my last edits they were not vandal like. --Softstarrs23 (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

You should create articles in your user page space first, and move them to mainspace only when they have at least like 3 listings in each section, that would be much better :-) That's also what I do personally. Good luck! Syced (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

The test is Wikivoyage:What is an article? To be worth creating as a destination page, we normally expect that there's some way to get to this place, something to see or do once there, somewhere to eat and somewhere to sleep. The guides also need to be a reasonable size, were the voyager to print them and bring them in carry-on baggage. A string of tiny speck-on-a-map villages with one thing to see in each are usually better presented by grouping these geographically into something of reasonable size; conversely huge New York City-sized destinations are split into boroughs or districts. The tiny village with no restaurant or no hotel really shouldn't have its own page if there's nothing to see or do there. K7L (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)