Wikivoyage

Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/May 2012

< Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion
← April 2012 Votes for deletion archives for May 2012 (current) June 2012 →

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned aerial image. There is a notice of some sort that may be a copyright on the image itself, and no license info provided with the upload. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:59, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Delete, it's unlikely to find its way into an article. I like cake though, maybe I should have some cake. (WT-en) Travelpleb 05:41, 27 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned McDonald's logo, which is trademarked. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:59, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned scanned map image with no license info provided. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:50, 26 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. These are both orphaned, resized copies of Image:Tp6.jpg. No need for three copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:50, 26 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:43, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete I've updated the map of Kuala Lumpur's transit network (new stations have been added) and loaded it onto Wikivoyage Shared with the same file name. This makes the old image obsolete. I think local images take precedence over those in Wikivoyage Shared, which means that the new map can't be used in the article until the old image is deleted.
Therefore, perhaps, deleting the image on the English Wikivoyage website will automatically place that on the Shared website in the article for Kuala Lumpur.
(WT-en) Travelpleb 10:45, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Yes, it will. (WT-en) LtPowers 10:59, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
  • Speedy delete the en: version, unless there is some objection. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:36, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Cool. Kill it, kill it quick. The KL article's coverage of local transport is mess that I'm currently trying to ameliorate. This would help. (WT-en) Travelpleb 08:19, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:23, 3 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Shaund 02:16, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Shaund 02:16, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Two copies of the same Google Maps image - copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Shaund 02:16, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Non-travel animated gif, no license specified. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Shaund 02:16, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Shaund 02:16, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. This is an orphaned, smaller version of Image:Mermaid cph.jpg - there is no need to keep two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. This appears to be an orphaned advertisement, and an argument could also be made that this violates the "no recognizable individuals" policy. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. This is an orphaned, smaller version of Image:Celeba Xan.JPG - there is no need to keep two copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned copy of Image:Nant2.JPG - there is no need to keep multiple copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned copy of Image:Nant3.JPG - there is no need to keep multiple copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned copy of Image:Nant4.JPG - there is no need to keep multiple copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Orphaned copies of Image:Nant5.JPG - there is no need to keep multiple copies of the same image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 16:55, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Bangor is a closed military base, not a city of its own, and cannot be visited. It certainly fails the "can you sleep there" test for everyone but military personnel on orders. -- (WT-en) D. Guillaime 12:26, 8 February 2012 (EST)
    • It's too bad; it's a nice little article. =( It sounds like military families might have reason to visit, is there any way we can justify keeping it? (WT-en) LtPowers 21:52, 8 February 2012 (EST)
  • Delete. The description reads like every U.S. Navy base anywhere. Of course there's a Navy Exchange, a commissary, and several fast food chains. Most of the article's real content is just a description of how to get in and around. And as pointed out, it is only relevant to Navy personnel and families. -- (WT-en) BigPeteB 09:35, 10 February 2012 (EST)
  • Keep. There is no justification for deleting it. We have articles on other military-only areas such as Wake Island and on areas such as Mecca where travel is restricted to Muslims. (WT-en) Pashley 20:18, 12 February 2012 (EST)
  • Keep-ish. I don't know this base well enough to understand if it's large enough to warrant an article (if not change my vote to a merge), but the point has been made in the past that some Wikivoyage articles might have a smaller, more specific audience than normal travel books, and that audience might include service members, scientific expeditions, or just people who want to read about a place they can't actually go to in person - see Wake Island for one existing example. If this base really is a small town that is open to military personnel only then it probably doesn't hurt to keep it around. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:28, 25 March 2012 (EDT)
  • Redirect On Wikivoyage policy grounds I think Bangor lacks what it takes to be an article. If you washed up at Wake Island and said "Hi, I'm not sure I Understand what made me Get in here but I'd like a somewhere to Sleep and something to Eat (subsection Budget)", there's a chance you'd surprise the military personnel (or appeal to their compassion) enough to get them. At Bangor, they'd just say "Sod off to Poulsbo".
I agree with D. Guillaime in that Bangor has as much interest as a college campus, which I guess makes it worth mentioning breifly. The presence of a TRIDENT submarine base may be interesting to note in the Kitsap Peninsula article but "submarine spotting" would be an individual "Do" entry rather than needing a whole article. The what is an article? policy states that information about attractions, sites, and events should always be initially placed into the article for the place they're located in, and only when that information becomes large and complex should a new article be considered, which is how I think the base should be categorized.
On a practical note: anyone with business on the base will be unlikely looking to Wikivoyage for help to get around the base and anyone looking at Wikivoyage will be unlikely to find the article useful or interesting. Wake Island is wierd and quirky and hence interesting. There's nothing particularly notable about a run of the mill navel base. Even Kitsap's own tourism website can't manage anything helpful to say about the base from a tourism perspective.(WT-en) Travelpleb 06:03, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
This one is a more tough call than usual between keep and redirect (but it definitely should be redirected, rather than deleted). I'll hop off the fence to help close the entry, though, and go redirect per Travelpleb. It looks like the bigger problem here, though, is that Kitsap Peninsula is heavily over divided into little hamlets, which would be better amalgamated into bottom-level region articles. This makes it harder to see where to where this content should be merged and/or redirected. --(WT-en) Peter Talk 11:37, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
I said keep above, but I'd be happy with a redirect as well. (WT-en) Pashley 21:07, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
  • I'm going to Redirect this to Kitsap Peninsula and add a couple of lines in that article about it unless there's any objections. I'll leave sorting out the regional hierarchy to someone who knows that part of the world. (WT-en) Travelpleb 07:06, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Redirect

Bangor -- an off-limits naval base 4 miles west of Poulsbo, home to submarines equipped with Trident missiles
(WT-en) Travelpleb 23:38, 5 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:35, 7 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. This image is now orphaned, and at 225x175px probably isn't worth re-integrating into an article. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:42, 24 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:17, 8 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete per Wikivoyage:Image policy#Photos of businesses. This image might have been OK if it was being used to show what a typical lodging in the area was like, but since it was used solely to show a single business current policy is to delete it. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:24, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Three copies of the same image, all orphaned. If someone wants to incorporate one of these into an article then it could be saved, but there is no indication of what article would be appropriate and the image isn't of high enough quality that losing it would be a concern. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:59, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:53, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Both appear to be the same satellite image, they are watermarked, and there is no indication the original sources are CC-SA licensed, so speedy delete as likely copyvios. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:32, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 18:17, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:24, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:24, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:24, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:24, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:24, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. These are all (now) orphaned images that are all thumbnail-sized and of varying quality, which is often an indicator that the uploader took them from another web site; none have licenses specified. Several are historical images, which are typically not used in Wikivoyage articles, one is of recognizable individuals, and two are of businesses. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Three orphaned copies of the same image - apparently a town crest? These shield images typically aren't used in Wikivoyage articles, meaning that this image will remain orphaned and thus should be deleted in accordance with Project:Deletion policy#Reasons to delete images. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. Four orphaned images of varying size and quality with no license info specified, so these are highly suspicious as potential copyvios. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. If it was a female wearing a hat in the photo instead of a guy in a coat then this would actually be the example from Wikivoyage:Image policy#People in photos: "A photo of the Taj Mahal is useful for travellers; a photo of your girlfriend in a funny hat standing in front of the Taj Mahal is not". It's almost tempting to find a way to keep this to use in that policy article, but alas, no model release provided... -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 20:21, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:26, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete all. All are orphaned and all state "copyright www.backpackiraq.blogspot.com" with no indication that they can be re-licensed CC-SA. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 19:31, 8 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. These are all copies of Image:ChimenyRocksmall.png (the smaller image has the timestamp cropped). No need for three unused copies of an image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:31, 8 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 11:52, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete This page has almost no content. Can be added to the region page which itself could use extra content. (WT-en) Cheyenne 00:26, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
  • Redirect to Nordland]. Name is a possible search term.(WT-en) Travelpleb 03:25, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
  • Keep. Can't see a deletion rationale. Appears to be a valid article, in need of development. --(WT-en) Inas 06:39, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
Comment The rationale against a stand alone article is to concentrate sparse content into one decent article rather than have it spread across many, essentially useless, outline articles. Hence I suggested a redirect, to focus attention on one article. If and when that article overflows with content, then it can be atomized into smaller, more specific, articles. Whether this is Wikivoyage policy I'm not sure, but it makes sense to me and Cheyenne!(WT-en) Travelpleb 08:13, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
if it is a a policy issue, then should be discussed on the deletion policy page, not here. If you are nominating an article for deletion, it should refer to one of the current deletion rationales. Having no content is not a current deletion rationale, and could be applied to thousands of articles across the site. I'm happy to see the region reorganised into something that makes sense. --(WT-en) Inas 20:45, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
  • Redirected according to the deletion policy of keeping valid locals. (WT-en) Cheyenne 19:05, 17 May 2012 (EDT)
  • No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 19:18, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
  • Speedy delete. The original author removed all content, no need to keep a blank article. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:52, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • No content (WT-en) –sumone10154 19:18, 30 April 2012 (EDT)
  • Speedy delete. The original author removed all content, no need to keep a blank article. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:52, 1 May 2012 (EDT)
  • Keep The article appears to have some useful content in the history, that could form the basis of an article if someone were to revisit the area. I don't see it makes a difference whether the original author blanked it, or someone else. --(WT-en) Inas 23:47, 1 May 2012 (EDT) Whole thing appears to be a copyvio. --(WT-en) Inas 06:56, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Satellite image. The image is tagged CC-SA, but I see no indication on the Digital Globe site that they license content under that license -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. Several of these images indicate they were taken from other web sites, but there is no indication they can be re-used under the CC-SA license. See also User talk:(WT-en) Jykcjy#Uploads. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:53, 1 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Orphaned scanned map with no source specified - delete as a likely copyvio. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:27, 2 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. No clue what the purpose of this template is supposed to be, but it is unused and there seems to be no need to keep it around. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:29, 3 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. This template redirects to East Afghanistan. Nothing links to it, so I'm not sure why a redirect from the template namespace would ever be needed. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:29, 3 May 2012 (EDT)
    • The page that was originally at that title is Ghorband Valley, which is also a redirect now. There wasn't much there to start with, but when it was moved to mainspace, the redirect was left behind as usual. (WT-en) LtPowers 09:55, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. This is apparently meant to be used for styling a table, but there are no uses of this template on the site. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:29, 3 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. From the talk page this appears to be an attempt to allow placing text over images, but it never caught on and is unused. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:29, 3 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Renders "this image was created with Inkscape", but it appears to be unused. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:29, 3 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete. Non-travel related image. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:44, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:10, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:19, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. While some of these images are tagged "PD-Self", these images can also be found on http://www.singaporeflyer.com/ and there is no indication that they are CC-SA licensed (the web site states "For high-resolution images(s), please submit a request to access our media photo gallery"). -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:50, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. These are all tiny (around 120px) orphaned thumbnails with no indication of source. Image:Shibiat.jpg in particular looks to have some sort of notice on it, so these are suspicious as copyvios. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:32, 4 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:27, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:40, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. Image is already on shared. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 00:00, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. The quality and size of uploads from this user vary dramatically, none of these specify a source, and most of this user's images can be found elsewhere on the web, so it seems highly likely that these are not original works and thus suspect as copyvios. Not all of these are orphaned, but the risk of potential copyvios would seem to outweigh any disadvantage of deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:44, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. The quality and size of uploads from this user vary significantly, none of these specify a source, and many of this user's images can be found elsewhere on the web, so it seems highly likely that these are not original works and thus suspect as copyvios. Not all of these are orphaned, but the risk of potential copyvios would seem to outweigh any disadvantage of deletion. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 21:44, 9 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:09, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:43, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:43, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:43, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Speedy delete: I have already deleted this "article" twice, and the new user has now restored it for the third time. I posted to his/her user talk page after the first time I deleted the "article." I appreciate the new user's enthusiasm but hope that s/he will pay attention to our efforts to communicate with him/her. (WT-en) Ikan Kekek 22:24, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Speedy deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 17:43, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete all. While these are all tagged "PD-Author" they also all state "image is the property of www.wildcoastholidays.com", so it isn't entirely clear that the image is truly public domain. Delete out of an abundance of caution. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 22:01, 10 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted all. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Orphaned image with no license or source specified, and the same image can be found at . While it's possible the Wikivoyage image precedes the other, since this is unused I'd suggest deleting it out of an abundance of caution. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:52, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:37, 26 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:37, 26 May 2012 (EDT)

  • Delete. Orphaned image with no license or source specified, and the same image can be found at with the caption "Source: www.i-rezekne.lv", so delete out of an abundance of caution. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:52, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Deleted. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 23:37, 26 May 2012 (EDT)

Result: Redirected to São Paulo. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 13:50, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage:Votes_for_deletion/May_2012&oldid=4924371"