Talk:Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
Latest comment: 5 years ago by SelfieCity
Should these three be grouped together like this? They are so far apart, they must have almost nothing in common from the traveler's perspective. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Officially, the three of them make part of one only British overseas territory, I think that's why. The Understand section is brief but very clear. Ibaman (talk) 01:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see the rationale, but at the same time, does that mean much if you visit the islands? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- As each of them has its own page already, I think it's appropriate to have this "region article" grouping them in the official entity in which they belong. I would object more to the recent creation of separate articles under Hong Kong/Outlying Islands, for example, as I imagine these to be very tiny, very close apart, and very sparse of attractions and Eat or Sleep options individually. But this page here, I don't think it excessive. Ibaman (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm coming round to your view. By the way, thanks for the your work cleaning up after the vandalism just now. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- As each of them has its own page already, I think it's appropriate to have this "region article" grouping them in the official entity in which they belong. I would object more to the recent creation of separate articles under Hong Kong/Outlying Islands, for example, as I imagine these to be very tiny, very close apart, and very sparse of attractions and Eat or Sleep options individually. But this page here, I don't think it excessive. Ibaman (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see the rationale, but at the same time, does that mean much if you visit the islands? --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)