Talk:Janapar Trail
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 217.117.125.83 in topic My edit
My edit
edit@Ibaman: Why did you undo my edit? 217.117.125.83 13:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ibaman reverted your edit per wv:tone. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think the IP user's edit was OK. "Armenian-controlled" is a more neutral expression. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- As the Armenian occupation was not internationally recognized, I think it's okay to call it an occupation. Ground Zero (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- It's OK but not necessary. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Ground Zero: Why do you think so? 217.117.125.83 12:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Because it has been recognised by other countries as Azerbaijani territory since independence. Armenia invaded and occupied the territory, so "Armenian-occupied" is a fair description. Ground Zero (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- By other countries but not Artsakh and de facto Armenia. 217.117.125.83 07:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Because it has been recognised by other countries as Azerbaijani territory since independence. Armenia invaded and occupied the territory, so "Armenian-occupied" is a fair description. Ground Zero (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- As the Armenian occupation was not internationally recognized, I think it's okay to call it an occupation. Ground Zero (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think the IP user's edit was OK. "Armenian-controlled" is a more neutral expression. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)