Talk:Port Hedland
VFD discussion:
This is a residential suburb of the larger Port Hedland location on the north coast of Western Australia.
I have been out of the loop for most of this year, and as a consequence do not want to delete (or a merge), being so close to getting back into the swing of things, but would rather quick conversation on this, as means of ascertaining correct process. South Hedland is not a tourist destination by any means. Trust fellow eds understand my need to check this first, even though I thought Icould have possibly deleted without discussion. JarrahTree (talk) 08:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- The info can be merged into the Port Hedland article easily. JarrahTree (talk) 09:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- And that would be the right thing to do. Policy is to not delete real places, but a merge & redirect seems in order here. Indeed merging or redirecting can be discussed on the article talk page rather than here, but there's no harm in some extra discussion ;-) Welcome back! JuliasTravels (talk) 09:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- As long as fellow eds dont feel otherwise put out, I suspect that Australian locations have relatively low watch numbers, and would rather even do a merge here, for the sake of process. JarrahTree (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- That article isn't very interesting. I certainly trust your judgment to merge and redirect it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- JarrahTree I'm trying to watch the Australian articles, and have had some success in merging districts back up into the small towns that really don't require districtification. Agree with merging this one. --Andrewssi2 (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Merged with Port Hedland as it is a suburb of a small town. --Traveler100 (talk) 07:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Thanks JarrahTree (talk) 14:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)