Talk:Songdo Central Park
Latest comment: 21 days ago by SHB2000 in topic Merge?
Merge?
editShould this be merged somewhere? City parks very rarely get their own articles on Wikivoyage. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 08:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is in Incheon, which is not districted at present. It's not impossible that someone could make a good argument for districting Incheon, but as part of that argument, User:Ysrfield would have to explain how this park has enough content to be a district article like Manhattan/Central Park for it to be reasonable for there to be an article about it. My feeling is, based on how long the Incheon article is, it probably wouldn't make sense to divide it into more than 3 or 4 districts, at most, and none of them will be just a park. But the proposal would have to be made and put up for discussion before any district articles can be created. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Would IMO just make sense to have Songdo Central Park as a subsection of Incheon#See than go to all the extent of districting – and even if districted I doubt there is anywhere near as much content to warrant its own article like Central Park, to be fair. So yeah, I'm with you on this. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 09:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yep. If Incheon is districted later, this should just be an attraction in a district. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Done Merged and redirected. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 10:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yep. If Incheon is districted later, this should just be an attraction in a district. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Would IMO just make sense to have Songdo Central Park as a subsection of Incheon#See than go to all the extent of districting – and even if districted I doubt there is anywhere near as much content to warrant its own article like Central Park, to be fair. So yeah, I'm with you on this. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 09:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
