Talk:Melilla Airport
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SHB2000 in topic Merge with Melilla#By plane?
Merge with Melilla#By plane?
editThis is not a significantly large airport, nor is it a major transit hub, to warrant its own article. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 11:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore it miss the credit of the source: w:es:Aeropuerto_de_Melilla. --Andyrom75 (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- If it's copyright violation, it should be deleted, rather than redirected. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright violations should indeed be deleted, and even if it wasn't, regional airports do not get their own articles here. --Ypsilon (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- They don't, but the article could be merged and redirected if it weren't copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright violations should indeed be deleted, and even if it wasn't, regional airports do not get their own articles here. --Ypsilon (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- If it's copyright violation, it should be deleted, rather than redirected. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Redirect. I do not see anything that really needs merging, so avoid the copyvio problem by not merging. Pashley (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)- The problem with that is that the copyvio will be in the history of the redirect, unless we oversight all of it. Do you volunteer to do that if a consensus develops for a redirect? I should say, a much easier solution would be to delete and then create a new, completely clean "Melilla airport" redirect - if you really think we need one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do not really think we need the redirect. I was just looking for the simplest solution, & if that's to just delete, so be it. Pashley (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Done – seems there's consensus to delete the article. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do not really think we need the redirect. I was just looking for the simplest solution, & if that's to just delete, so be it. Pashley (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- The problem with that is that the copyvio will be in the history of the redirect, unless we oversight all of it. Do you volunteer to do that if a consensus develops for a redirect? I should say, a much easier solution would be to delete and then create a new, completely clean "Melilla airport" redirect - if you really think we need one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
