Wikivoyage

Wikivoyage:Star static map nominations

This is the nomination page for nominating star static maps. Click here to skip to current nominations.

Guidelines

edit

Nominating

edit

Before a file is nominated, check if it meets the following requirements:

  1. The PNG file is at least 1MP.
  2. It was created by a Wikimedia contributor; the map mustn't require attributing or linking Wikitravel. Static maps created by Wikitravel users who do not have Wikimedia accounts are disqualified automatically.
  3. It has appropriate licensing; if a map is based on OpenStreetMap, simply state that (e.g. Photo: own work, based on OSM). Inadequately-licensed maps will likely be deleted on Wikimedia Commons and are thus ineligible. EXIF data is not required.
  4. Maps have a source file. A map that doesn’t have an appropriate baseline for future editors to edit is not one of the finest static maps. In addition, anything not on the two map templates, such as road or rail route markers, must be included under the “source” tab.
  5. Most maps will have two files, a PNG and an SVG. Although SVG files are crucial, the PNG file is what’s usually displayed and should be the file that’s nominated. However, maps without an SVG file are ineligible as they cannot be edited easily.
  6. Maps should generally follow the English Wikivoyage style. It’s okay to stray away slightly and experiment with new things, but the underlying principles on Wikivoyage:How to draw static maps and Wikivoyage:Regions map Expedition should still be followed.

If the map fulfills the above six criteria, then categorise it into one of the following four categories:

  • Region maps – this is for maps with colour-coded regions, countries or districtified cities – for regions, these include both the maps for non-bottom-level regions and bottom-level regions with regions included to illustrate districts (e.g. Hunter).
  • Bottom-level region maps – this category is specifically for region maps but with no further subregions.
  • City, district, park and diving maps – these maps contain individual POIs; however, these tend to be discouraged on Wikivoyage in favour of dynamic maps, but the few exceptional maps go in this category.
  • Other – in some rare cases, a map may not fit into one of the three maps. Such could be a map for an itinerary or a transit network (specifically made for Wikivoyage).

If you’re unsure of what makes a good static map, here are a few elements that most maps contain:

  • Important roads
  • Route markers
  • Important cities labelled
  • The general geography of the area – this shouldn’t be a problem as most Wikivoyage maps have this, but some maps don’t.
  • Important ODs (such as national parks or important historic/cultural sites) labelled.
  • Important airports or railway stations (for smaller region articles or districtified city articles)
  • Colours that don’t contain difficult-to-read text or strain your eyes.

Keep in mind that these should be treated on an individual case-by-case basis – sometimes, the additions of these can make the map too crowded or can be too fine-grained. A map not having the following is not a reason to oppose by itself, though a plain map is also not one of the site’s finest maps.

Creating a nomination

edit

Once you've read the instructions above and you're ready to create the nomination, enter the name of the PNG/JPG file (not the SVG) into the input box below. Do not delete the file prefix; if you do delete anything prefilled, do not omit the file prefix.


After that, copy the name of the nomination and transclude it here. For example, if you are nominating File:Foo.png, then add {{Wikivoyage:Star static map nominations/File:Foo.png}} to the very top of the aforementioned link.

Voting

edit

The voting process will be held for a period of 21 days, which starts as soon as the nomination is created. Nominators and creators can withdraw their nominations at any time, provided that the level of support is below 50 per cent.

After 21 days and a minimum of three votes:

  • Maps with more than 60 per cent support will be promoted.
  • Maps with less than 40 per cent support will be slushed.
  • Maps with support ranging from 40 per cent to 60 per cent will have their discussions extended for another week.

Users should clearly indicate their preference by bolding their vote or by using Support, Oppose or Neutral templates. Any user may vote, but obvious troll or sock votes may be removed at the discretion of any user in good standing. While raw votes are not prohibited, try and give a reason alongside your vote.

Once a map is promoted:

Current nominations

edit


Not ending before August 4, 2023, 12:04 (UTC)


Not ending before July 23, 2023, 11:27 (UTC)
Talk:South East Queensland#Static map remarks has a few of my other remarks. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 12:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interim outcome: 1 support, 0 oppose → nomination extended. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 01:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Not ending before July 21, 2023, 13:00 (UTC)
  • Support Time to kick this newly-found process – here's the first nomination that isn't a test. It's a good baseline map for me for several reasons:
  • Contains all major highways, including those that connect to the United States, Alberta and the Yukon. Important routes are numbered (BC-5, BC-3, BC-97, TCH-16 and TCH-1 – BC-99 is a bonus for me, though I don't know if it would also be desirable to mark YT-2)
  • Major ODs are marked.
  • Accurately reflects the current region structure used on British Columbia.
There are a few minor things that could be improved, though: it would be preferable if "(US)" could be appended next to Alaska since it is not a Canadian province. It would also helpful if the label for Tatshenshini-Alsek PP would be moved up, but that's a minor issue for me. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 13:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is an excellent map that meets the stylistic requirements of a static map. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 15:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The choice of an equirectangular projection here is understandable (especially since most of our state and province maps also use it) but it does make the Northern B.C. region look even more enormous than it already is. Powers (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Thanks for the nomination. I'll try to fix the items SHB2000 noted in the next couple of days.
Re the projection, I actually have a half completed new version of the map in BC Albers (the "official" projection used by the BC government), in part because I wanted to address the imbalance between northern BC and southern BC (I also wanted to tweak the colours to improve readability). Unfortunately, the map is a pain to deal with so the combination of busy life + annoying data set has pushed it to the side. -Shaundd (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Revised map is up with suggested labels changes, Vancouver's airport added, and changed the font sizing and colour a bit to improve readability. -Shaundd (talk) 18:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interim outcome: 2 support, 0 oppose → nomination extended. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 01:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing a nomination

edit

Once a nomination is fully closed:

  1. Move the subpage to the archives section, which is sorted out by year.
  2. Add the map to the relevant subpage of Wikivoyage:Star static maps/Galleries.
  3. Add a note clearly indicating the outcome of the discussion and that it is closed.

See also

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage:Star_static_map_nominations&oldid=4687840"