Talk:Kiruna Municipality

The "settlements" section edit

What benefit to the voyager does it deliver? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The same as listing cities in country and region articles. ϒpsilon (talk) 09:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Split the article? City proper and municipality edit

Kiruna municipality covers a vast land area. Some destinations have articles on their own (Abisko, Jukkasjärvi etc). The urban part of Kiruna is also interesting in its own right. We should consider to have Kiruna Municipality as a super-article, containing the destinations mentioned above, as well as Kiruna itself. /Yvwv (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it makes sense to me. Kiruna is a prefect candidate for such splitting. Have we got any precedens of such hierarchy with two consecutive "city" destinations? Or are such municipalities treated as regions? This is a common feature for many rural areas. Danapit (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Compare Uppsala and Uppsala countryside. /Yvwv (talk) 07:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sure, something similar would be very suitable for Kiruna, imo. Danapit (talk) 12:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

[Rest of discussion moved to Talk:Kiruna.]

Return to "Kiruna Municipality" page.