Talk:Naples

Earlier in the saummer I added some info (and links where possible) on various modes of getting around in the Naples area. Sorry for not mentioning this earlier. (WT-en) L.J. Brooks 18:25, 04 Sep 2006 (UTC)

Added some info on safety tips for people travelling in Naples and the area. (WT-en) L.J. Brooks 18:39, 04 Sep 2006 (UTC)

May 10, 2011: I am reading conflicting info regarding which ANM bus to take from Napoli Centrale Train Station to the Capodichino Airport. This site: http://www.napoliunplugged.com/Naples-ANM-Bus-System.html says that the 3S is no longer in service and advises one take the C58. I just thought I would add this into the discussion in case someone with more authority on the wikivoyage site wanted to update. I will need to get from the train station to the airport tomorrow, so I guess I'll find out for sure then. —The preceding comment was added by 93.45.197.139 (talk • contribs)

Watch out for terms

I just reverted some edits, since some words used are in my opinion quite contentious. I'm open to discussion.--Ferdinando Scala (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Galleries

I don't like all those small photos. I would take the time to enlarge then and separate them into different spots in the article, but I have to go to sleep, so for now, I'm just noting this as an important task. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

"Sleep" section

I just did a major cleanup of the "Sleep" section, which was incorrectly formatted and full of touting and fluff. The next question is whether hotel listings that are nothing but a name and contact information should be deleted. Your input, please. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Most of the entries should be removed. --Gobbler (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

--- Budget ----

• B&B Naples - ?
• Bed and Breakfast La Bouganville - good
• 6 Small Rooms Hostel & Guesthouse - good
• Dei Decumani bed & breakfast - good
• Giovanni's Home
• Hostel of the Sun
• Hotel San Giorgio - good
• Hotel Speranza
• Potenza Hotel

I don't feel confident removing listings with descriptions, but please remove any that shouldn't be there. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Cristo velato.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Removed. There are way too many images in a row, anyway. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Too many images

There are too many thumbnails on this page by far, as per WV:Image policy. Which ones are least important and should be removed? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Because they are appropriately spread out through the article, I don't think they are a problem, but we would not lose much by dropping the pictures of the airport hall, a cup of coffee, and a pizza. Ground Zero (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

There are a whole bunch of them in a row, so I don't agree that they are appropriately spread throughout the article. Thanks for your suggestions. I disagree in part, though, because I think a picture of la vera pizza napoletana is important in an article about Naples. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

I moved more images around and removed a couple, but I'm still not satisfied, as there are too many images bunched in the "See" section. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Stazione alta velocita, Zaha Hadid, Naples Afragola.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Reason: No freedom of panorama in Italy and the architect died in 2016 whereas they have to be dead for 70 years for it to be OK to show a picture of their work. So if we think it's so important to keep this photo in the article that we should consider it fair use for the educational purposes of a travel guide, we'd need to upload the photo locally. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Actually, maybe not. A previous nomination for deletion was denied on the following basis: "in Italy are considered below the threshold of originality the buildings that are not recognised as "remarkable" by the Ministry (Direzione Generale Arte e Architettura contemporanee e Periferie urbane)." Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Stazione alta velocita, Zaha Hadid, Naples Afragola.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Visible on the page. It's a cool building, but is it important enough to claim fair use of it? The reasoning is: "No FoP in Italy. Architect Zaha Hadid died in 2016, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country." Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hmmm...I think so. From the article: "A massive new high-speed railway hub, 3 Napoli Afragola, has been built about 12 km north of the city centre." But let's have a second opinion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Looking at the thread, this file has been kept once before and the file may be kept again. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

I voted for speedy keep, and now that A1 is banned from making comments at CDR, it may as well be kept again. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

We shouldn't count on it, though. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Can somebody from Naples please check the coordinates of Galleria Borbonica?

On my computer the coordinates of Galleria Borbonica point to a spot in the sea. Travelosaurus (talk) 08:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Indeed. It seems they might have been copied from a dd:mm:ss or dd:mm.mm format to the decimal format we use, without correcting the figures. I replaced them with the corresponding ones from Wikipedia (which is said to be the source for the ones at Wikidata). –LPfi (talk) 11:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Listings look weird in this article in Safari

What the heading says; listings in the article don't look normal, instead some low-level code is displayed. This problem only shows up:

• in the Naples article as far as I've seen (today I'm digging around random articles to find entries for WV:Discover so I've seen a lot of articles in the last hour or so)
• in the Safari browser (like the shrunk banners I mentioned in the pub), not Firefox
• literally in this article; when I copy-pasted all of the article's code to my sandbox, the listings looked normal

Ypsilon (talk) 16:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Just made a dummy edit to the article, deleting one empty space at the beginning as that usually resets stuff or something and now all listings look normal. --Ypsilon (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Toledo metro station (J).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

No FoP in Italy – I think I'd much rather have File:Estación de metro Toledo, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-26, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg than the existing image of Toledo station, though. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 09:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Which existing image? We do have this photo in the article, and it's a no-brainer to upload locally with a big warning for no-one to use it commercially and that if they nevertheless do so, they do so at their own risk. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)