Talk:Okomu National Park

VFD discussion

• Keep I have downgraded this from speedy deletion after some of the copyright material has been removed. I have rewritten parts of it, and added some new information. I think this is an article we should have. If copyvio material remains, please remove it. If anyone has other information to add, please do so. Ground Zero (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
• Thanks. I seem to remember now a discussion in which we decided that revision history doesn’t have to be deleted in case of copyvio in a past edit. With that in mind I don’t advocate deleting now, but would like to see more non copyvio content added to the article before voting to keep. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 02:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

I am hoping that @AmyCutie: can help with more information. Ground Zero (talk) 02:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - repeat offender. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 02:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

@SHB2000: while I agree that AmyCutie has not heeded our warnings, this is now a very different article than the one the she created with copyright text from other websites. Ground Zero (talk) 03:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I was thinking of a different user. Got both these users mixed up. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 03:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep It is a real place better described in its own article. We should not through out significant work by others because of what we think about the original author (I haven't acquainted myself to her edits, so have no opinion on her). I trust that the wordings have been changed enough not to infringe on any copyrights (there is no copyright on the facts). –LPfi (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
• Outcome - speedily kept as ineligible for deletion.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

What do we do with articles that are just full of copyvios?

Swept in from the pub

Had a look at Okomo National Park, and almost all of it is copyvios, from about four different websites. Since this article is so new, I doubt the others copied text from us, considering that hometown.ng is a pretty reliable tourism website, that I doubt will copy from us. So for articles like these, do we just nuke them, or do we remove all the text from it? Also, just letting you know, it still lacks an outline template. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 01:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

My understanding is that copyvios are speedy deletion candidates. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 01:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

I'll let Amy know about this. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 01:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

I've literally cut all the text possible and somehow made it to 52% from 91. I think we have no choice but to delete it. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 01:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

I've done some rewrites, deletions and additions. Can it be kept now? I think an article on a national park is worth keeping. Ground Zero (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 03:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)