Talk:Danube Cycleway
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SHB2000
VFD 2021
edit[From Votes for deletion]
Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 00:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not the worst, but definitely not usable. Delete per above. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. According to the article: "one of Europe's most popular long distance bicycle route, part of EuroVelo". I.e. not personal itinerary. –LPfi (talk) 09:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- As with the Elbe-Radweg, there is a relevant website (even tho this one seems to belong to a tour operator) Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- OK, great. Who wants to add the information so that there's actually a defined route in the article that people can follow? Expecting people to go to an external link in order to be able to take a trip isn't the purpose of Wikivoyage; the information that's really needed has to be in the article. (And I'm replying to you, but this isn't personal to you but to everyone who wants to keep the article while it's in its current condition.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the commercial site does not describe the route, only the cities it passes, or at least I don't find that information on their site. Makes sense, of course, as on their tours you don't need to know how to find your way. The Danube Cycleway is part of Eurovelo route 6, Atlantic–Black Sea, linked from our article. One could try to go from there, but don't hold your breath for my doing it. Knowing German and Germany would probably help for the upper sections. –LPfi (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- OK, great. Who wants to add the information so that there's actually a defined route in the article that people can follow? Expecting people to go to an external link in order to be able to take a trip isn't the purpose of Wikivoyage; the information that's really needed has to be in the article. (And I'm replying to you, but this isn't personal to you but to everyone who wants to keep the article while it's in its current condition.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per LPfi. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 13:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Ikan Kekek, unless someone is willing to improve it. There have been no substantive improvements since 2013. We should not leave it in this state indefinitely. Ground Zero (talk) 22:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Outcome: three deletes, two keeps, and it's been given 14 days to be worked on. Therefore delete. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)