Talk:Great Glen Way
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SHB2000 in topic vfd
Links moved from article space edit
Hi, everyone. This links were sitting by themselves on the page. I put them here in case they're really useful for editors, but in the article, only official links should be used (I didn't check to see if these were or not, because they didn't belong where they were, in any case), and they need to be front-linked, as shown on the external links page.
Here are the links:
Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- One of these ends up on the same page [3] as the link at the start of the article. This is linked from the Highland Council page, and so is fairly official. AlasdairW (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- OK, fair enough, but if this links are needed in the article, they can't be by themselves and have to be put into a coherent context. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- This link is already at the top of the article, so no further changes are required. AlasdairW (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
vfd edit
Great Glen Way edit
Great Glen Way (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Per the one year rule for itineraries. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- No info about the route, and is not properly formatted. Needs TLC. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The one-year rule specifically exempts famous marked trails. This is one that certainly merits an article. As you say, it needs TLC – not deletion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as a clearly defined route with travel information. --Comment by Selfie City (talk | contributions) 16:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a waymarked official track. The article is usable for the the first half to Fort Augustus. It does have info about the route, but could have some more. AlasdairW (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added details on the route and things to see. Ground Zero (talk) 01:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Outcome: Kept, as its near usable. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)