Talk:Biobío
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SHB2000 in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
VFD discussion edit
Biobío edit
An almost empty region article within Southern Chile. Appears to be a administrative division rather than a travel relevant one. Should it be deleted or merged and redirected? Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. a), lack of content is not a valid reason for VfD-ing an article; b), doing so would require us to redesign the breadcrumb chain to figure out what category Concepción belongs in; and c), we don't delete real places anyway. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- It's already listed under "cities" in Southern Chile - whose subsections are imho all superfluous at this point... Hobbitschuster (talk) 17:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, pending discussion of what to do about all of the subregions in Southern Chile. -Shaundd (talk) 22:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Wikivoyage:Deletion policy#Deleting vs. redirecting. -- Ryan • (talk) • 23:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly. The title could be redirected to another article, but it shouldn't be simply deleted along with its history, such as it is. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. Pashley (talk) 12:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, I have reorganized the articles in Southern Chile so they are under their sub-regions. When you look at the numbers it is a debatable on as to whether these regions should exist or not, but all under Southern Chile would probably be too many. --Traveler100 (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
See Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/November 2015. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- It's a copyright violation. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 09:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)