Pauldsgg

Hello, Pauldsgg! Welcome to Wikivoyage.

To help get you started contributing, we've created a tips for new contributors page, full of helpful links about policies and guidelines and style, as well as some important information on copyleft and basic stuff like how to edit a page. If you need help, check out Help, or post a message in the travellers' pub. New users are also welcome to post any questions or concerns to the arrivals lounge. If you want some practice editing, please do so on our graffiti wall. If you are familiar with Wikipedia, take a look over some of the differences here. If you want to contribute with information about the place where you live, see Wikivoyage:Welcome, locals.

And nice work on your articles about BC :-) --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Indeed, thanks for your great updates and contributions to articles like the one about Surrey (British Columbia)! One small request: when you add listings, please don't delete any fields you are leaving blank. Thanks again, and carry on! Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Check your posting for Long Table Distillery - it is terribly out of date - maybe not post hours but more services and go to our website for hours etc as they are not static. 2001:569:5009:D200:5DE2:848E:A302:C943 15:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Since you know that, why did you not edit them? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

An award for you!

	The Wikivoyage Barncompass
	For your countless updates and additions to Canadian articles! Ypsilon (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

UNESCO markers

Hi there. I don't think we've already met, so a belated welcome to the Wikivoyage team from me!

You're probably not aware that there's a discussion taking place about the markers on the WHS article, which you should probably look at and take part in before adding any more markers. It'll save your time.

There's some disagreement as to whether they should be used in that article at all, but also there's an issue with the specific way you're doing them. It's a software issue rather than any fault of yours, but essentially each marker category can only use a maximum of 99 markers; any markers beyond that number are all labelled "99", rather than "100", "101", "102" etc. So we need to decide whether to use them on the article at all (personally I'm in favour), and then figure out a way of doing it that gets around the glitch.

Hope to see you on that discussion -Talk:UNESCO World Heritage List#+Geo?. To reiterate, it's not your fault that there's a glitch, but we need to find a solution. All the best.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)