Wikivoyage

Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/November 2024

< Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion
← October 2024 Votes for deletion archives for November 2024 (current) December 2024 →

Unneeded duplicate of Pituamkek National Park Reserve but with no salvageable content. Hog Island exists as a redirect and I don't see the need to maintain this with the disambiguator as another redirect. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 00:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd still delete it. We have a listing for Hog Island in the park article & I just fixed the Hog Island redirect so it points to the listing instead of the article, so this article (even as a redirect) is entirely unnecessary. Pashley (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I think you summed it up better than I did. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This comes across like an unreferenced Wikipedia article, rather than a travel article. There is no information on how to get there, what to see and do, where to eat or where to sleep. This place is so small that it doesn't have a Wikipedia article yet. No-one has tried to rescue this article by adding travel information over the last two.months. Ground Zero (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iresi is mentioned in wikipedia:Igbajo. It is about 10 miles east of Ada town. Looking on the map, I see little of interest in Iresi. AlasdairW (talk) 22:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – it has remained as such since March. 7 months is more than enough time to develop it into an actual article as opposed to the sad sombre article it is. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per community consensus. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 02:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar stub article that reads like an unreferenced enwiki article (cf the last few stub nominations) with no integration whatsoever and has been abandoned for more than 1 month. I would redirect, but it's easier for a newcomer to start an article from scratch than it is from a redirect and there is zero salvageable content from here. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 10:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support The article's creator, @Churerange:, hasn't made any further edits to Wikivoyage since creating this article, so I don't think, we'll see any travel content added. Ground Zero (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Considering the content in w:Bardibas, it's conceivable someone could create a viable Wikivoyage article about this place if they created informative listings about the points of interest, etc. This isn't it, but if Churerange comes back and says they intend to whip it into shape, we could keep it. Otherwise, I wouldn't object to either deletion or turning this into an Outline even without additional information for now beyond what's required for that article status. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: deleted as it has been 16 days. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created this by accident but it is superfluous as I now understand that Template:NPR has documentation autogenerated by Template:Individual_currency_template_documentation. Stilljourney (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar case as #Etang-Salé above with no integration whatsoever. Furthermore, individual beaches don't get their own articles per WV:WIAA; unsure whether to redirect or delete, but I'm leaning towards delete since a) the content is barely salvageable; and b) it's not even capitalised properly. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 00:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per SHB2000. Ground Zero (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename & Redirect This one had some absolutely breathtaking photos on Commons and I didn't know Réunion even existed before this Vfd, so since it taught me something new, I didn't have the heart to let it's sandy little head lay on the chopping block. It seems to be that the most productive course of action is to rename the page to Petite-Île without leaving a redirect to the current name. However in the spirit of honoring the work of the original author, I think a redirect should be made for Grande Anse Beach (or Bay, if the preference here goes to naming pages for geographical features over attractions) to Petite-Île. I know my little bit of tinkering left it far from ship-shape and Bristol fashion, but I was mindful to address the stated concerns of the nomination. I do believe it is now integrated, has a page banner and as in the previous case, another grain of sand in the oyster for a future editor. — 🐈ℛogueScholar🗨₨Talk (My recent mischief) 14:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename It would make a decent start for a Petite-Île article. Pashley (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm fine with that, but someone has to fix the format and style, so that it's a Wikivoyage article and not an irregular stub. Unless someone does or at least says they plan to do it, it should be deleted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Outline created with most of the content and some info added from w:Petite-Île, and the article redirected (by the old name). I should of course have moved the page instead, but didn't think of that. A history merge is still possible. I permalinked the original in the summary, so moving it or the redirect will not much affect attribution. –LPfi (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: new article created and redirected. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 00:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this point it resembles more akin to an unreferenced simplewiki article that has been lying abandoned for almost a month. Nothing I see is salvageable and it would be easier for a newbie to start an article from scratch than work with this. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: deleted. Ground Zero (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Wikivoyage:Votes_for_deletion/November_2024&oldid=4977237"