Wikivoyage:User ban nominations/Archive

This page is for archiving content from Wikivoyage:User ban nominations.

This page is split up into several subpages, categorised by year.

107.9.140.157 edit

107.9.140.157 (talk · contribs)

This user has created several copyvios, hoaxes (for road routes that do not exist), and deliberately misleading information to several articles, demonstrating no sign of change either. I don't see much hope when they have refused to respond to any of the talk page messages directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 20:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if this requires a formal user ban, rather than just blocking at sight like Brendan. Meanwhile, block for a month. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm subconsciously treating this like an ANU thread, even though this isn't such. I'll change the block later today if there are no other objections. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 23:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, they've just earned themselves a 2-week block. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 01:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

70.68.168.129 edit

70.68.168.129 (talk · contribs)

This user is being disruptive and unwilling to listen with their use of AI in discussions. Can someone else look at their behavior since I've been directly involved? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 05:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the incivility on Special:Diff/4860194 and Special:Diff/4860189 are grounds for a ban, but it's best for an uninvolved admin to impose it. Any takers? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've revdel the revisions. But it's a bit sloppy since I have to redact the text after someone replied to it. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 07:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it looks good to me (tho the hammer would be nice). Cheers for that. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see Ibaman already blocked them for a month before. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I now blocked them for three months for the talk page message. I haven't been involved lately, and I don't think my previous comments on their talk page can make me regarded as partial. –LPfi (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, LPfi. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 08:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent comment posted by the user at Talk:British Columbia is alone grounds for a ban. Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 14:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed. However, blocking their IP address for more than a few months is probably useless, as addresses get reassigned. –LPfi (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The ban should be a "permanent" ban in the sense that any reappearances of this editor should be blocked, but for no longer than three months for the reason you stated. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 21:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I didn't recall having blocked but went to check the history, which clearly shows that whoever is generating this AI interaction is not here to build a travel guide. Ibaman (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the reasons above. Ground Zero (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - 70 seems to have been trolling from the outset. Gizza^(roam) 23:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]