Renek78

Hello, Renek78! Welcome to Wikivoyage.

To help get you started contributing, we've created a tips for new contributors page, full of helpful links about policies and guidelines and style, as well as some important information on copyleft and basic stuff like how to edit a page. If you need help, check out Help, or post a message in the travellers' pub. If you are familiar with Wikipedia, take a look over some of the differences here. Pashley (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Images with writing on them

Hi, Renek78. I know there's a policy against having photos with people's names or other stuff like that written on the photo. I can't find a reference right now, but I know that's Wikivoyage policy. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Ikan Kekek. I did not mean to undo your removal of the pictures. I guess I accidentially modified an older version of the page. Should be fine again now. --Renek78 (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Not a problem. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Mapshape for Buenos Aires does not work

Swept in from the pub

Hi all, me again with an issue with Mapshape. Just now I am fooling around with an overview map of Buenos Aires. Coloring the districts via Mapshape works great, but unfortunately I am not able to grey out everything behind the city boundaries. The code is supposed to look like this:

I also checked the OSM relation - it seems to be a closed contour. Any ideas, what is wrong there? Thanks again! --Renek78 (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

If you were to add type=geoline to the Mapshape template, the output would show that the line created is not closed - top right on map (coordinates needed to create a polygon have to be complete or closed). -- Matroc (talk) 17:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Matroc With Geoline I can see, that something is open at relation Comuna 13. In OSM though it is closed and fine. Recently somebody messed around with this relation in OSM and someone else reverted this edit. Maybe we just need to wait a few days until it is fine again. Thanks for your help. —The preceding comment was added by Renek78 (talk • contribs)

That has happened on a few occasions such as all the water area around Sydney Opera House disappearing. Hopefully it will be fixed soon! -- Matroc (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Dynamic maps without Wikidata items

Hi there, thanks for the message on User talk:Shaundd/Dynamic Region Map. I saw your comment in the Pub first, so I left a response there. If you want more detail on the process, let me know. Cheers -Shaundd (talk) 06:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Moving hotels in Singapore

Hi,

I saw you have been doing a lot of work recently on some of the Singapore articles. Thanks for that, those are really huge improvements.

I saw that you have been moving some listings around which where in the wrong district. Generally I think that is a good idea, but there is one case where I would like to revert your move. You moved two hotels from Singapore/Riverside to Singapore/North and West. Now while the two hotels are technically in the area which we designate North and West, I would argue that they belong to the other article. They are still pretty close to the river and in my opinion fall into that same group of hotels as all the other ones along the river. North and West is a sort of collection of everything outside the city centre, and as such in my opinion should contain hotels outside the city centre.

Let me know what you think.

BTW, if your motivation for the move was that there is not enough hotels in the North and West article, then I can think of a couple other ones to add to that article.

Drat70 (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Answered on the Singapore talk page. --Renek78 (talk) 06:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for fixing the coordinates on the Bugis article just now. I saw that the map suddenly looked funny but didn't realise it's because I entered the coordinates wrongly. Drat70 (talk) 08:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome :) --Renek78 (talk) 18:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Slovakia regions

Hi/Nazdar! Some inspiration for the region split (incomplete/imprecise in some places). Andree.sk (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Fort George

• Entered code on your talk page for a maplink to make a geoshape for Fort George if you can use it...

Recent changes to Manhattan districts

Hi Renek78, I noticed you recently shuffled a number of listings between Manhattan districts. Looking at the changes, it seems like you were aligning listings with the mapmasks you added -- but those mapmasks don't match the current district boundaries shown on the static maps. Was there a discussion to change Manhattan's district boundaries to align with the boundaries in OSM? I don't see one but wanted to check with you. Cheers -Shaundd (talk) 02:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shaundd, this is our usual dilemma. Stick with 6 years old maps, which are outdated and never get updated or change to a dynamic map with a slightly different district setup and always up-to-date maps. I have not discussed it, simply plunged forward. The main issues arose in Gramercy Flatiron. This district goes up north a lot more than on the static map - even includes the Empire State Building now. The rest of the districts are actually very close to the dynamic maps, I would say. --Renek78 (talk) 08:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for taking so long to respond, been very busy. I disagree this is the usual dilemma. We can create a dynamic map without a mapshape. Plunge forward even calls out region and district changes as something to be careful about, particularly on high profile articles or where there's been previous discussion about district boundaries. Dividing geographical units also says "use caution, consensus, and collaboration when possible". When I have a moment, I'll open a discussion in the Pub, but my opinion is the district changes should be undone unless there is a consensus to align them with neighbourhood boundaries in OSM. -Shaundd (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shaundd, maybe I was a bit too quick in changing the article. I guess you are right and we should discuss the issue. Thanks.--Renek78 (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I don't even see the need for mapshapes at all when the static map is clear. Whichever changes should be made can be requested. Sorry to say, the dynamic maps are ugly compared to the static maps in Manhattan district articles and less clear, and we surely don't want to waste space by having 2 types of maps on these pages. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Renek78,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikivoyage and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 14:32, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Trains that are faster than planes

Yes, it is indeed faster to take the train on many routes as the airport isn't most people's final destination and you have to show up early for a flight. Compare for example NUE-TXL where Eurowings threw in the towel since the train takes only three hours... Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Renek78,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Baden (Switzerland) article maplink

• I corrected the maplink for that Article - saw that you had done some tests on it; thought i would pass that on - left note on talk page) -- Matroc (talk) 04:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Renek78,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

KL walking itinerary

Nice start! I did various small edits; see what you think of them and edit them at will. I look forward to watching the progress of this article!

I should say, I think it's probably Usable and not a Guide yet, because it needs more descriptions, but keep working and it'll soon be a Guide.

Yang ikhlas,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ikan Kekek, thanks for your positive feedback and your edits! I used Southern Ridges Walk as a template for the KL walk and forgot to demote the status to Usable. Yang ikhlas (thanks for teaching!), --Renek78 (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Sama-sama. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

A point about copyleft

Hello. Thank you for sorting out the listings on the Mayfair / Westminster border, making sure they're in the right article.

When you move listings between articles in future, rather than writing "Moved from another article" in your edit summaries, it would be better to write e.g. "Moved from London/Westminster". This is because each article credits all its contributors in the edit history, and so in accordance with our copyleft licence, those authors are still creditable if there's an edit summary that points to their original location. For the same reason, any third party who reuses Wikivoyage content is supposed to credit the original page they took the content from.

I hope this makes sense. All the best, ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, ThunderingTyphoons!, gonna keep that in mind! --Renek78 (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)